Editorial policy

Sources and evidence

Every non-obvious claim is cited. Papers, official documentation, dataset cards, standards and first-party technical reports come first. A secondary source is used when it is the clearest record or the primary cannot be retrieved, and the text says so. Unknown values are reported as unknown.

Review and updates

Every published article passes the content-schema, citation-resolution, internal-link, accessibility and production-build checks. Its review date changes only after a material factual or explanatory review. Fast-moving model, dataset, evaluation and deployment pages are checked more often than mathematical foundations.

Expert criticism

Researchers, maintainers, engineers and educators may review an article for errors or missing context. A reviewer is named only with permission, and a conflict is disclosed when someone reviews coverage of their own work.

Corrections

Correction requests name the page, the disputed claim and a supporting source. A confirmed error is fixed in the article and, where relevant, its structured data or interactive; a material correction gets a new review date.

Open a content-correction report on GitHub or review the repository's authorship and image credits.